{"id":1885,"date":"2020-11-10T12:26:58","date_gmt":"2020-11-10T11:26:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/superspecialinfo.cz\/?p=1885"},"modified":"2020-11-10T12:27:00","modified_gmt":"2020-11-10T11:27:00","slug":"pojednani-o-migraci","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/superspecialinfo.cz\/en\/pojednani-o-migraci\/","title":{"rendered":"MIGRATION TREATMENT"},"content":{"rendered":"

MIGRATION TREATMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

People are multiplying uncontrollably in some parts of the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I believe that just as there are immutable and insurmountable laws of nature, so there are laws of behavior of society as a whole. However, we can change them, but if we can change the behavior of the individual, more precisely, a large number of individuals.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Humanity is multiplying. People from populous states move elsewhere for mostly economic reasons, \u00a8<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which would not play a role with a small number of migrants. However, with a large number of migrants to less populous countries, it is actually a covert invasion, and if the countries do not understand it, they will soon understand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What such a migration actually looks like.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

First, smaller groups of migrants - foreign people - move in with you. They are inconspicuous, decent and almost unknown, but unlike regular migration, they do not integrate into your population, do not accept your culture, and their children in the next generation do not speak only your language. They simply do not feel affiliation with the state and nation that has given them the conditions to live, whether economically or in terms of freedom of speech and expression, which their nation and state did not give them. Nevertheless, they constantly adhere, speak the original language in their communities and maintain the cultural and religious customs they have brought with them. Those small groups will prepare the ground for the next waves. These are people from developing countries who are used to having a lot of children, and the numbers between migrants and indigenous peoples are beginning to change. In Western countries, the increase in the number of children among migrants is still strongly supported by social policy and massive child allowances. As these are mostly fast-growing groups and as this vanguard creates the conditions for the arrival of more migrants from a given country, the number of migrants in a given country will start to grow rapidly. In the next phase, when the percentage of the number of migrants to the number of original inhabitants will increase significantly, migrants will start to have requirements! First, to get more support, better accommodation. Then they start wanting to get their representatives into communal politics and finally on representation in the government, on the construction of their shrines and, worst of all, they start usurping the local population, that they should actually behave according to them so that the local population adapts to their customs and traditions. They will also begin to enforce their laws into the laws of the host country. And if not, they call them racists provocateurs and plotters of clashes or even war. In history, we have also seen moments when it ended with territorial demands and the desire to join the state from which the migrants came. Eventually, they will want it to become their host country, that is, in the case of Muslims, eventually join a Muslim country, such as Turkey, and become part of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What if the Turks in Germany want to join Turkey. Or what if Mexicans in the US want to join Mexico. You will find countless such examples yourself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If everyone could live where they thought, then any populous country could take a less populous country without a fight. If, for example, 100,000,000 Chinese moved to Germany, then China would be from Germany. If, for example, 100,000,000 Indians moved to England, then India would be from England. You can definitely create other examples yourself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It feels like a coordinated attack. Well, he's actually a coordinated attack. And every land attacked in this way has the right to defend itself as if it were a military invasion. It's about her, basically it's about that.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

This phenomenon, combined with the huge overpopulation of some countries and the inability of these countries to remotely provide their inhabitants with an acceptable standard of living, must undoubtedly lead to a tragic end, according to the laws of society and civilization.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Because humanity is much more numerous than during World War II, also much more technically advanced and much more brutal due to the breakdown of morality and respect for values, it can be expected that horrors and casualties will exceed many times what has been seen in history, in my opinion it is only one possible way out. With the help of decision-making churches and states, reach the limits of the population for individual countries. Reduce the numbers of significantly overpopulated populations<\/p>\n\n\n\n

countries so that each family can have only one child. Likewise, to limit the number of migrants in individual countries, stating, for example, that there can be a maximum of 5 percent of immigrants in each country. If it were higher again to proceed that each family of migrants can have only one child. I believe that in the next fifty years, the world could stabilize and create conditions for a quality life for all its inhabitants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Migration yes or no<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When you watch television and their suffering on television, for example, an injured child feels at that moment that he or she should be helped. If it was an individual, it would probably be true.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But what if we look at it from a different perspective. There are almost a billion (1,000 million) Muslims in the world. Almost all live in poor countries. Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Pakistan together have more than 400 million inhabitants. Turkey ..<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

How many of them want to live in a rich Europe for them. Almost everyone. And what people in Africa could accept them as well. These are also some hundreds of millions. And what if we accepted even 700 million Indians living below the poverty line. The European Union, including the United Kingdom, has a population of around 500 million. Can he afford to receive a billion people and take care of them? And what about 2 billion or 3? Probably not! So how many people can he accept! And under what conditions!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Take a look at the map of Europe. It does not seem strange to you that suddenly wars have begun all around the borders of the European Union. The Arab Spring and its experiments. Tunisia, Algeria, Libya there completely succeeded, Egypt sticking to yak-taksh, Syria, Iraq changed in the truce, Avganistan, Georgia, Ukraine.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

And we have to believe that this is a coincidence. Islamic state. Who financed it, at least from the beginning before he got the money from the oil. There have been many wars in the Middle East, but there has never been a massive migration of refugees to Europe. Suddenly, after the Arab Spring, millions of refugees began to flock to Europe. Who organizes it and why.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MOVE ALL PEOPLE FROM DEVELOPING COUNTRIES TO EUROPE AND THE USA!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

AND THERE IS NO REASON FOR IT.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Being born somewhere doesn't mean you have to live elsewhere! And not without work at all. Do you think that is not the case? I was born well in a block of flats. But you have a nice villa. I will live with you! And then my family, too. Um, but you have a nice toy car. Well, that cottage is great. When we make it up to you, you'll report it nicely, and if you don't, you'll see. And if you die out, we'll pull on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If I decide I don't want to work and want to live in a shack, that's my right. No one has the right to force me to have another way of life that he considers better. It's my choice and I have a right to it!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But then I can't say, well, I want the great car - so you who are looking for such cars to be at all, so give it to me, because I have a poor right to it! Well, great health care too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                SO REALLY NOT!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is possible to take some people from different poor areas of the world to 3,4,5 years to Europe or the USA to teach them work and our way of life. Previously, people went on a hike or experienced to other countries. Then return these people back to their lands. It will also be up to them whether they introduce our system in their countries or stay with their original system. It's their choice. That's really the only help! When you have children you think it is better to give them an education to teach them how to create and work something or to give them a bucket of money<\/p>\n\n\n\n

and not be interested in them? I grew up in a European country that is not very rich in European conditions, but I grew up in the top quarter of the rich and saw how some friends ended up who had everything materially, but otherwise nothing!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you take a foreign element into your country, you need to keep a few key things in mind. People who come from miserable circumstances may be grateful to you at first, but then that will change. These people have different habits and traditions. They will have children and they will most likely teach their traditions and habits. So not diligence, reliability. Not because they were bad people, but because they just don't know it. And so the next generation, which only knows, your country will not get caught in it. And what they have left - frustration! They will start to hate you. How come they don't have the job of you! And the smaller percentage that gets caught will hate you for not catching most of their cousins. And so almost everyone in your soul will hate you. This can and will probably lead to tragic ends, perhaps even a civil war.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It must be said that people are not very tolerant.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those who claim how everyone should love each other (and not that this should not be true in the future) should look and learn from history and ultimately the present. Shiites against Sunnis, Catholics against Protestants, state against state, nation against another nation, gang member against member of another gang, fans of one club against fans of another club, village against village, family against family, neighbor against neighbor. The list of this love seems sufficient to you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The evolution of the species and its changes take tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands and sometimes millions of years in nature. See where humanity was 150 years ago. No cars, planes, internet, cell phone. Virtually no healthcare at least
for the vast majority of the population. There was slavery in many countries. The right to vote ha ha. If at all, it was only for men. Women did not reach the right to vote until the 20th century. In the United States, for example, it was not until 1964 that the Civil Rights Act was passed in the United States, and in 1965 the Electoral Rights Act, which allowed colored people to truly vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have a friend who is originally from the Sudetenland, actually a mixed Czech-German or German-Czech family. At a young age, he was raised by his grandmother - a German. And she planted in him, let's say, a decent Great German idea. I must say that he is, in its essence, a very good, absolutely honest and numerous person. But when he sighs or we are alone and opens up, you can see how deep it is in him. He really struggles with it and knows it's wrong. If you have an ugly hand or you don't like something about it, you can cut it off. It is not possible to cut off a piece of the soul. It's just in you. And if you are not a really strong personality like my friend, then you can easily succumb to it. So what if there are a lot of people around you seducing you, how about different refugees from different countries?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What should I think when I see a Dutchman of Turkish origin and \/ or a Dutch-born Turk in the Netherlands? As I shout, I'm a Turk. Well, why do you live in Holland? Why don't you go back to Turkey? You like Turkey. Go build it! But not in Holland, please in Turkey!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 The new Turkey, built on the foundations of the great Ataturk, is becoming a great modern country (I hope that Turkey will not spoil it under the onslaught of religious or power madness).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If anyone in Turkey wants to, they can look at the example of Germany and how its efforts for a national and power spread through the dictatorship of hatred of others in terms of race or religion turned out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where could Europe and the world be if there weren't lunatics in Germany who wanted to control everything by force?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So if you accept someone, he would have to go through something like a receiver in the war and swear allegiance to his new homeland. Not everyone knows that in the USA lived during the Second World War. war a large number of immigrants from Germany or their descendants. None of them placed a flag with a swastika in front of the house or apartment. If so American. And hundreds of thousands of Germans of national origin served in the US military and fought not only against Japan but also against Germany. Such love must be felt by your new citizens in their hearts. If you can't do it like this, you have a really big problem. And that you can't do it is quite likely, because the United States is very specific in that it doesn't have a single predominant indigenous ethnic group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LESSONS FROM HISTORY<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As it was in the past. How did migration take place in history and with what consequences:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

We can begin with the migrations of nations in the distant past, which led to wars, changes in land ownership, the extermination of entire nations. Well, it was a long time ago. There is perhaps no need to discuss some closer settlement of North, Central and South America. But that's also history. So what about the 20th century. I live in the Czech Republic, part of the former Czechoslovakia. Germans and Czechs lived in the border areas of Czechoslovakia. In some also Hungarians and Poles. The Germans and the Czechs fought together in the first St. war on the one hand within the Habsburg monarchy, which was an ally of Germany. The Czechs and Germans in the Czech-Czechoslovak borderland were so mixed over the centuries of living together that there was virtually no difference between them. It depended more on a personal feeling whether someone declared their German or Czech nationality. In addition, they were of the same faith - Christian. In the end, however, they came up with the idea of breaking away from Czechoslovakia and joining Germany. The whole culminated in the Munich Agreement and the occupation of the Czechoslovak Borderland by Germany in the Czech area and the Slovak borderland by Hungary in the Slovak area.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

- Another example is the acquisition of Kosovo, which has always been sovereign Serbian territory or poor Lebanon.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

POPULATION RESPONSIBILITY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When we look at the continents, Europe, Australia, Canada, the USA and Russia are behaving in a population-responsible way. With the increase in technological capabilities created in Europe, it has been possible to increase food production at an unprecedented pace. The field of medicine has also enabled the survival of virtually all newborns. These very noble things in themselves, that is, ensuring that people are not hungry and that a substantial reduction in child mortality has brought about a huge population explosion in Asia, Latin America and Africa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Example: China had a population of 1950 in 1950. Today it has over a million inhabitants<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                               India had a population of 1950 in 1950. Today it has over a million inhabitants<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                               Egypt - had a population of 24 million in 1950, today has over 100 million inhabitants<\/p>\n\n\n\n

                               Turkey - had a population of just over 17 million in 1920, today has a population of over 80 million<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Indonesia<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brazil<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Colombia<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nigeria<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Congo<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kenya<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tanzania<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is just a list of examples. Addressing overpopulation and poor living conditions in many of these countries by moving everyone to Europe and North America to make them better is completely pointless!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is necessary to introduce quotas for the population of each country and to achieve them with one child per couple.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

How will the number of people on the planet increase? In two ways, or a combination thereof. Everyone can think of it - the family has more than 2 children. But that's not all. If you increase the average age of a person from 60 to 120 years, even if all couples \/ families \/ have exactly 2 children, there will be a significant increase in population. If medical science allows a significant prolongation of human life, it is necessary to include in the equation for maintaining a reasonable population of the planet not only the number of newborns \/ family, but also the expected average life span of an individual!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 Number of people on Earth:<\/p>\n\n\n\n